Rule 34 rule
Rule 34 rule
Edit: WE DON'T TALK ABOUT NUMBER 11.
Rule 34 rule
Edit: WE DON'T TALK ABOUT NUMBER 11.
Lisa Simpson being 2nd is vile wallahi 🤮
Hope you don't find out who #11 is. (I DDG'd it and wish I hadn't.)
Was thinking "surely it can't be worse than Lisa Simpson". I was wrong. I was so incredibly wrong.
Yeh I scrolled down, now I see why Thanos snapped.
R34 doesn’t allow loli or shota content anymore. So all of the content of children is just them aged up looking like actual adults. Still questionable, but better.
Lisa Simpson? Louise Belcher? Aren't they little kids?
I used to subscribe to r/rule34 for a laugh but somewhere along the line it went from being silly to being an excuse to make underage cartoon characters into porn. So this list doesn't surprise me.
How does Lisa and Meg beat out Lois Hayley and Amy. Wft is that shit.
Comment section full of idiots thinking this is real.
Was not expecting Elon Musk.
It's Rule 34. It's always real.
Haha what kind of degenerate do you have to be to find any of these characters hot enou-
Amy Wong
We shouldn't judge others so harshly...
I'd have an orgy with her any time.
|>11 Maggie Simpson
This has to be bots, please. Someone has to be just fucking around. This can't be real.
Yeah I went ahead and blurred that out of the image
Thanks for the effort, I should have just laughed and cringed at the memes and skip the comments, and my day would have been much better :')
Isn't there an episode where Maggie is grown up? Or am I thinking of Lisa?
I choose to believe it's the adult version
You’re thinking of Holidays Of Future Passed.
Elon Musk is #26 and Tracer is #27. So there are definitely some edgelords fucking around and messing with the stats.
Probably long form comics that have Maggie in the intro panel doing nothing. Or so I'm choosing to believe.
Anya Forger is usually in the single digits in the anime boorus and she's five. :/
The fraction of teenage/underage girls on that list is too damn high (hell, Louise is 9)
If it makes you feel any better, from a quick scan through some of the images the vast majority of them at least seem depict the characters as older and grown up.
Controversial opinion: If killing npcs in video games is fine and shouldn't land you in prison for murder, because they are fictional and not real people, then porn of "underage" fictional characters is also fine and shouldn't be illegal.
Finding something disgusting is not a proper reason to make something illegal. The only relevant aspect is whether it causes harm to others or not.
In the UK it doesn't matter if its a photo of a real person or not, porn that depicts a child is illegal.
Tbh I think with the use of AI at this point this might be a pretty good law to have. "It was AI generated" is not a defence. Realistically if you are doing it for yourself no one will find out so there is some kind of argument as to it being harmless, but when you start doing other things with those images such as using them for blackmail the police should be able to use that as sufficient evidence to charge you.
I still find it fucked up that so many people are aroused by sexualising children, even though they are fictional.
I'm not talking about legal judgement (I practically never do) and I'm not even talking bout legit PDF files.
It's just disgusting that rule 34 of literal children scores this high.
Legality and morality don't necessarily align. I would find it very immoral, but as far as I know, not illegal, to get off to drawings of children. Additionally, what's the difference between a photo of a child and a realistic drawing of a "fictional character" that looks like said child? I think getting off to children is wrong, regardless of criminality. If that's something someone desires, they should seek help, not indulge in fantasy.
loli haet pizza
I'm normally an anti-slippery slope person but there's a definite escalatory nature to how paedophiles operate, it's easy to see how images of fictional children can evolve into images of actual children.
Out of 11 we have:
Maggie Simpson Lisa Simpson Louise Belcher
And maybe Hayley Smith and Meg Griffin? Or are they 18?
Anyways, that’s a really high proportion, like a thirdish.
I agree but the availability of csam on the internet (real or simulated) reduces the instances of real-world abuse so... take that as you will I guess :/
Edit: I learned that in college about 7 years ago, but I researched it again and apparently the opposite is true, according to more recent evidence.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10701425/
I'm not arguing against rule 34ing these characters.
But I refuse to believe that the fraction of actual pedophiles on rule34 is that high such that three of the top 11 haven't even hit puberty yet.
I think that lots of these numbers comes from some sort of taboo breaking.
Does it? I used to see this argument a lot on Reddit back in the early days when there were a lot more pedos on there and I don't really buy it. Are there any actual studies on this? I feel like there have got to be better ways at managing it than that at least from a clinical standpoint
Honest question since i'm not a guy: When you guys are masturbating to Lisa Simpson do you think.you are fucking her in 3D or 2D? Are you a simpson character or is she a yellow little girl? Just trying to.understand your minds
Regardless, this is very fucked up, but I'm curious anyway
Okay, I can't speak for this extremely fucked up example, but in general it's very simple:
There is no need to imagine any fucking, seeing the image is enough to get you into the mood, looking at it long enough (or at different images for long enough) will get you most of the way there, and the hand can take care of the rest
Wait, you don't imagine elaborate narratives where, say, Adrien Brody's car breaks down in a stretch in the wilderness with nothing but your cabin for miles. So he walks toward the only structure and I'm there studying mosses and it's so remote I have a sat phone I let him use to call for help, but it'll be a while so I make him some tea and we get to talking. Night falls before help comes so I light a fire in the pit and let him borrow a sweater I stole from an ex and pull out a bottle of whiskey I was saving for something special but it's special enough. It keeps us chatting untill the early hours when a tow truck finally shows and I see him off. When I get home from my studies I find a package waiting for me—it's the sweater he borrowed, a thank you card, and a bottle of fine whiskey?
(I'm uncomfortable sexually fantasizing about real people.)
hm I see. That's not how it works for women (usually)
now what would MY Simpsons porn parody be? https://youtu.be/QGJ_gy42yVM
2D but feeling 3D
Regardless, this is very fucked up, but I'm curious
It's normal.(We are degenerate 😣)
Wow, an anime character couldn’t even crack the top 10.
Rule34 has more western stuff than the sites that weebs use
Where this list came from? Nit anime or video game character make me think is some r34 page specialized on western animation
its mostly anime chars on FP right now. Glad I saw that Link x Rogue the Bat, it almost made up for the vomitting after reading who #11 was
Too niche
Nah they just have their own websites
What else do these all have in common?
They all have art styles that are purposefully designed to be really cheap and easy to make. The same choices that helped these studios crank out hours upon hours of formulaic content also helps the rule 34 artists.
Yup. Flat colors, thick ink lines, and very little detail. The goal is for animators to be able to reproduce the art quickly and reliably, to be able to churn out dozens of seasons.
Isn’t it obvious?
Drawing porn of animated characters looks close to the real drawing.
Also, all those are from sitcoms that teenagers watch, like no duhhh
Maggie on 11? You god damn sick fucks!!!
🤭
Lisa Simpson!!!???? Please no tell me this is joke
BART GET OUT, I’M PISS
Do you porn? Hard to miss this. It's really popular. I don't get it, but often see thumbs of her portrayed as an older teen.
princess bean is also like 16 i think like a 4th is ilegal
I don't think her age was ever canonically established? But I've always thought she'd be a bit older than that.
Something about all these characters that I can't get behind, art style? personalities? I'm really not sure they all seem unappealing
R34 is basically all western, maybe you would be more interested in a booru full of anime tiddy instead.
Or the MSG website full of fur.
Nah it's not an art style problem but maybe a sitcom thing? just don't like any simpsons, family guy, american dad, ect characters
I don't think it's a western animation thing and I'm not too picky to turn down furry or anime and would be nice to have erything in one place with easy searching but I just don't like those sets of characters
Skrillex?
meg famy guy